IGNOU MPSE 003 Free Solved Assignment 2022-23, IGNOU MPSE 003 WESTERN POLITICAL THOUGHT Free Solved Assignment 2022-23 If you are interested in pursuing a course in radio production and direction, IGNOU MPSE 002 can be an excellent choice. In this article, we will take a closer look at what IGNOU MPSE 002 is all about and what you can expect to learn from this course.
Important Links : Handwritten Hardcopy
IGNOU MPSE 003 Free Solved Assignment 2022-23 is a course offered by the Indira Gandhi National Open University (IGNOU) under the School of Journalism and New Media Studies. As the name suggests, it is a course on “Production and Direction for Radio.” The course is designed to provide students with a comprehensive understanding of radio production and direction and covers various topics related to this field.
IGNOU MPSE 003 Free Solved Assignment 2022-23
- 1 IGNOU MPSE 003 Free Solved Assignment 2022-23
- 1.1 Q1. Write a note on the significance and relevance of western political thought.
- 1.2 Q2. Evaluate Plato’s political philosophy. What was his contribution to western political thought?
- 1.3 Q3. Explain St. Thomas Aquinas’s views on law and the state and the relations between the Church and the State.
- 1.4 Q4. Analyse Machiavelli’s thoughts on politics and forms of government.
- 1.5 Q5. Discuss in brief Locke’s political theory.
- 1.6 6. a) Rousseau on civil society and social contract
- 1.7 b) Edmund Burke on democracy and religion
IGNOU MPSE 003 Free Solved Assignment 2022-23
Q1. Write a note on the significance and relevance of western political thought.
Western political thought refers to a body of ideas, concepts, and theories that have emerged from the Western world, primarily Europe and North America, and have had a profound impact on the world as we know it today. The significance and relevance of Western political thought can be understood from various perspectives.
Firstly, Western political thought has played a significant role in shaping the modern world’s political systems and institutions. Ideas such as democracy, liberalism, and socialism, which have emerged from the Western political tradition, have been the driving force behind many of the world’s political developments. The political systems and institutions that have emerged from these ideas have become the foundation of modern governance across the world.
Secondly, Western political thought has been instrumental in shaping the world’s intellectual and cultural history. The ideas and concepts that have emerged from the Western political tradition have not only shaped political discourse but also the broader intellectual and cultural landscape. From philosophy to literature, the Western political tradition has left an indelible mark on the world’s intellectual and cultural history.
Thirdly, Western political thought has played a crucial role in shaping the world’s economic systems. Ideas such as capitalism and free-market economics, which have emerged from the Western political tradition, have become the cornerstone of modern economic systems across the world. These economic systems have driven economic growth and development, creating unprecedented prosperity and wealth.
Finally, the relevance of Western political thought lies in its continued evolution and adaptation to contemporary challenges. The ideas and concepts that have emerged from the Western political tradition have continued to evolve and adapt to the changing world. Today, the Western political tradition remains relevant in shaping the world’s political, economic, and social landscape.
In conclusion, Western political thought has played a significant role in shaping the modern world’s political, intellectual, and cultural landscape. Its continued relevance lies in its ability to adapt and evolve to contemporary challenges, ensuring its continued impact on the world.
Q2. Evaluate Plato’s political philosophy. What was his contribution to western political thought?
Plato’s political philosophy is a cornerstone of Western political thought, and his contributions have been significant and enduring. Plato believed that the ideal society should be ruled by philosopher-kings, who possessed the knowledge and wisdom to govern justly and effectively.
Plato believed that society could be divided into three classes: the rulers, the auxiliaries, and the producers. The rulers were the philosopher-kings, who were responsible for governing the state. The auxiliaries were the soldiers and police, who enforced the laws and protected the state. The producers were the workers and merchants, who provided the goods and services necessary for the society to function.
Plato’s political philosophy emphasized the importance of justice and virtue in governance. He believed that the philosopher-kings should be trained in philosophy and ethics, so that they could rule with wisdom and integrity. Plato also believed that the state should be organized along meritocratic lines, with individuals selected for leadership positions based on their abilities and qualifications.
One of Plato’s most famous works, “The Republic,” explores the ideal society and the role of the philosopher-kings in governance. In this work, Plato argues that the state should be organized in such a way that each individual is assigned a role that best suits their abilities and talents. He also believed that individuals should be educated in philosophy and ethics from a young age, so that they could develop the knowledge and wisdom necessary for good governance.
Plato’s political philosophy has had a profound impact on Western political thought. His ideas about the importance of justice, virtue, and meritocracy have influenced political thinkers throughout history. Plato’s emphasis on the role of philosophy in governance has also contributed to the development of the Western philosophical tradition. Overall, Plato’s political philosophy remains a valuable contribution to Western thought and continues to influence political thinkers and policymakers today.
Q3. Explain St. Thomas Aquinas’s views on law and the state and the relations between the Church and the State.
St. Thomas Aquinas was a prominent philosopher and theologian of the Catholic Church in the 13th century. He believed that law and the state were essential for creating a just society and maintaining order. Aquinas’s views on law and the state were heavily influenced by his Christian faith, and he saw the state as an instrument of divine providence.
Aquinas’s concept of law is based on the idea that there is a higher law, which he referred to as “eternal law.” According to Aquinas, eternal law is the divine plan and purpose for the universe, which is known to God alone. Human law should be based on eternal law, and it should be used to promote the common good and ensure that justice is served.
Aquinas believed that the state had a responsibility to create and enforce laws that were consistent with the natural law. Natural law, according to Aquinas, is the objective moral order that is accessible to all people through reason. The state should promote the common good and ensure that individuals are free to pursue their own goals within the framework of the natural law.
Regarding the relationship between the Church and the State, Aquinas believed that the Church had spiritual authority over the state, while the state had temporal authority over the Church. He saw the two as distinct entities with different roles to play in society. The Church’s role was to provide spiritual guidance and promote the salvation of souls, while the state’s role was to maintain order and promote the common good.
However, Aquinas also believed that the state had a responsibility to support and protect the Church. The state should provide the Church with the necessary resources to carry out its mission and protect it from external threats. At the same time, the Church should support the state by promoting moral values and providing spiritual guidance to the rulers and citizens of the state.
In summary, St. Thomas Aquinas believed that law and the state were necessary for creating a just society, and that the state had a responsibility to promote the common good and ensure that justice was served. He saw the Church and the state as distinct entities with different roles to play, but also believed that they should support and protect each other.
Q4. Analyse Machiavelli’s thoughts on politics and forms of government.
Niccolò Machiavelli (1469-1527) was an Italian philosopher and writer who is best known for his book, “The Prince,” which is a treatise on the nature of power and politics. Machiavelli was a realist who believed that politics is a ruthless game in which the ends justify the means. In his view, the purpose of politics is to acquire and maintain power, and leaders must be willing to use any means necessary to achieve their goals.
Machiavelli’s political thought is often characterized by his view that human nature is fundamentally self-interested and that people will act in their own self-interest even if it means harming others. This belief leads him to argue that rulers must be willing to use force and deception to achieve their objectives, including lying, cheating, and even murder.
In terms of forms of government, Machiavelli was not particularly concerned with the type of government as long as it was effective in maintaining power. He believed that the ideal government was one that was strong, stable, and able to control its citizens. Machiavelli believed that the best form of government was a republic, which he defined as a state that was ruled by the people and had a system of laws that limited the power of the ruler.
However, Machiavelli also believed that a monarchy could be effective as long as the ruler was strong and capable. In “The Prince,” he argued that a good ruler must be both feared and loved by his subjects, but if he cannot be both, it is better to be feared than loved. Machiavelli believed that a ruler should be ruthless in pursuing his goals and should be willing to sacrifice personal morality for the good of the state.
Overall, Machiavelli’s thoughts on politics and forms of government were shaped by his belief that power is the ultimate goal of politics, and that leaders must be willing to do whatever it takes to acquire and maintain power. His work continues to be influential in modern political philosophy and remains a controversial figure in history.
Q5. Discuss in brief Locke’s political theory.
John Locke was a 17th-century English philosopher whose political theory emphasized the natural rights of individuals, limited government, and the social contract between citizens and their rulers. Locke’s ideas were influential in shaping the founding of the United States and the development of modern democratic societies.
At the heart of Locke’s political theory is the idea that individuals have natural rights, including the right to life, liberty, and property. These rights are inherent to human beings and are not granted by any government or authority. In order to protect these rights, individuals enter into a social contract with their government, giving up some of their individual freedoms in exchange for protection and security.
According to Locke, the government’s primary role is to protect the natural rights of its citizens. If a government fails to do so, citizens have the right to overthrow it and establish a new government that will better protect their rights. This idea is known as the right of revolution.
Locke also believed in the concept of limited government, in which the power of the government is limited by law and by the consent of the governed. He argued that government should only have the power necessary to protect the natural rights of its citizens and that any government that exceeds this power becomes tyrannical.
Locke’s political theory had a significant impact on the development of modern democratic societies, particularly in the United States. His ideas about natural rights, the social contract, and limited government are reflected in the Declaration of Independence and the US Constitution.
Jean-Jacques Rousseau was an 18th-century French philosopher and writer who is best known for his influential works on political philosophy, including “The Social Contract” and “Discourse on Inequality.” Rousseau’s ideas on civil society and social contract were central to his political philosophy and continue to have an impact on political theory today.
Rousseau believed that human beings are naturally good, but that society and its institutions corrupt them. He argued that in the state of nature, before the emergence of civilization and social institutions, human beings were free and equal. However, as society developed, inequality and oppression emerged, leading to the formation of government and the establishment of social contracts.
According to Rousseau, the social contract is an agreement between individuals to give up some of their natural rights and freedoms in exchange for protection and security provided by the state. This contract is based on the principle of the general will, which refers to the collective will of the people as a whole, rather than the will of individual citizens or factions. Rousseau argued that the general will is always aimed at the common good, and that the state should act in accordance with the general will in order to promote the well-being of all citizens.
Rousseau believed that the ideal form of government is a direct democracy, in which citizens participate directly in the decision-making process. He argued that representative democracy, in which citizens elect representatives to make decisions on their behalf, was not truly democratic because it allowed for the possibility of corruption and the domination of certain groups over others.
Overall, Rousseau’s ideas on civil society and social contract were revolutionary for their time, and continue to be influential in political theory today. His emphasis on the importance of the general will and the need for a government to act in the interests of all citizens has had a significant impact on the development of democratic theory and the understanding of the relationship between the individual and the state.
b) Edmund Burke on democracy and religion
Edmund Burke, an 18th-century philosopher and statesman, believed in the importance of religion as a foundation for society and government. He also had reservations about pure democracy as a form of government, preferring instead a representative democracy.
Burke believed that religion provided a moral compass and a sense of community that was necessary for a healthy and stable society. He argued that religion helped to instill virtue and self-control in individuals and promoted social order and stability. He also believed that religion provided a sense of shared values and beliefs that helped to bind communities together.
In terms of democracy, Burke was skeptical of the idea of direct democracy, where all citizens have an equal say in the decision-making process. He believed that such a system could lead to the tyranny of the majority and the oppression of minority groups. Instead, Burke advocated for a representative democracy, where elected officials serve as intermediaries between the people and the government. He believed that such a system would provide a check against the passions and impulses of the majority and would promote stability and continuity in government.
Overall, Burke believed that religion and representative democracy were essential for the well-being of society and that they should be used in tandem to promote social order and stability.
Immanuel Kant is widely regarded as one of the most important philosophers in the Western tradition, and his political philosophy is an integral part of his broader philosophical system. Kant’s political philosophy is centered around the idea of individual freedom and autonomy, and the ways in which society and government can support or detract from those values.
Kant believed that humans are inherently rational beings with the ability to make moral choices, and that it is the role of government to protect individual freedom and autonomy so that people can make these choices freely. He believed that the purpose of government is to create the conditions necessary for individuals to lead happy and fulfilling lives, and that the best way to do this is through the establishment of a just and equitable society.
According to Kant, a just and equitable society must be based on the rule of law and respect for individual rights, including the right to life, liberty, and property. He believed that individuals should be free to pursue their own interests and goals, as long as they do not infringe upon the rights of others.
Kant also believed that international relations should be governed by principles of justice and respect for human dignity, and that nations should work together to create a peaceful and harmonious world. He believed that war should only be used as a last resort, and that nations should strive to resolve their differences through peaceful means.
Overall, Kant’s political philosophy emphasizes the importance of individual freedom and autonomy, the rule of law, and the establishment of a just and equitable society. These ideas have had a significant influence on political and social thought throughout the modern era.
b) Jeremy Bentham and utilitarian principles
Jeremy Bentham was an English philosopher and social reformer who lived in the 18th and 19th centuries. He is widely known as the founder of the philosophical movement called utilitarianism, which is based on the idea that actions should be evaluated based on their ability to maximize happiness or pleasure for the greatest number of people.
Bentham believed that morality should be based on the principle of utility, which he defined as the ability of an action to promote happiness or pleasure and to prevent pain or suffering. He argued that the ultimate goal of human action should be to promote the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people.
Bentham’s utilitarian principles were focused on the idea of creating a society that is oriented towards the greatest good for the greatest number of people. He believed that this could be achieved through social and political reforms that would promote the well-being of all members of society, rather than just a privileged few.
Bentham’s utilitarian principles have had a significant impact on modern political and social philosophy. They have been used to argue for a variety of policy changes, from the implementation of social welfare programs to the protection of human rights. While there are some criticisms of utilitarianism, it remains one of the most influential ethical theories in Western philosophy.
8. a) Alexis de Tocqueville on religion
Alexis de Tocqueville was a French political philosopher and historian who is best known for his book, “Democracy in America,” which was published in two volumes in 1835 and 1840. In this work, he offers insightful observations about American society, including its religious practices.
Tocqueville believed that religion played a crucial role in American democracy, providing a moral foundation for the new nation. He noted that religion in America was characterized by a high degree of diversity, with numerous denominations coexisting peacefully. He also observed that religion was deeply embedded in American culture and that it played a significant role in shaping the country’s political institutions.
Tocqueville also noted the potential dangers of religion in a democratic society. He warned that religion could be used as a tool of oppression by those in power, and that religious extremism could undermine democratic values. He believed that the separation of church and state was essential to maintaining a healthy democracy, and that religious institutions should be free from government interference.
Overall, Tocqueville viewed religion as a vital aspect of American democracy, providing a moral compass for the country’s citizens. However, he also recognized the potential dangers of religious extremism and the need to maintain a clear separation of church and state.
b) John Stuart Mill on rights for women
John Stuart Mill was a prominent philosopher and political economist of the 19th century who was known for his advocacy of individual liberty and equality. He was also a strong advocate for women’s rights, and his work played a significant role in advancing the cause of gender equality.
In his book “The Subjection of Women,” Mill argued that women should have the same rights and opportunities as men. He believed that women were just as capable as men and that their exclusion from certain activities and professions was unjustified.
Mill also argued that the traditional division of labor between men and women was not based on natural differences but was instead a product of social conditioning. He believed that women’s inferior position in society was not a result of their inherent abilities but was instead the result of a lack of education and opportunities.
In addition, Mill believed that women should have the right to vote and participate in political decision-making. He argued that denying women the right to vote was a form of tyranny and that women had the same stake in society as men.
Overall, Mill’s work was instrumental in advancing the cause of women’s rights and laying the groundwork for the feminist movement that would emerge in the decades to come.
9. a) John Stuart Mill on individual liberty
John Stuart Mill was a 19th-century philosopher and political theorist who is widely recognized for his contributions to the development of the concept of individual liberty. In his most famous work, “On Liberty,” Mill argued that individuals should have the right to do as they please as long as their actions do not harm others. This concept, which has become known as the harm principle, is a cornerstone of modern liberal thought.
According to Mill, individual liberty is essential to the development of human potential and creativity. He believed that society should allow individuals to pursue their own interests and passions without interference, as long as they do not harm others. Mill argued that free expression and debate are critical to the discovery of truth, and that limiting these freedoms stifles innovation and progress.
Mill also believed that individuals should be free to pursue their own religious and moral beliefs without interference from the state or society. He argued that the state should not impose a particular set of values on its citizens, but rather allow them to make their own choices based on their own beliefs and experiences.
Overall, Mill’s concept of individual liberty emphasizes the importance of personal autonomy, free expression, and self-determination. It has had a profound influence on modern political thought and continues to shape debates about the balance between individual freedom and social responsibility.
b) Hegel’s philosophy of history
Hegel’s philosophy of history is a complex and influential theory that attempts to explain the direction and meaning of human history. Hegel believed that history was driven by the development of human consciousness, and that the unfolding of this consciousness was a necessary process that would ultimately lead to the realization of human freedom.
According to Hegel, history is not simply a series of random events, but a rational process with a purpose. He believed that history had a telos or an end goal, which was the realization of human freedom. This goal is achieved through a process of dialectical development, in which ideas and institutions clash with one another and are resolved through a synthesis that represents a higher level of consciousness.
Hegel argued that history can be divided into several stages or epochs, each characterized by a particular type of consciousness. The first stage is the oriental stage, which is characterized by a state of undifferentiated unity and a lack of individuality. The second stage is the classical stage, which is characterized by the emergence of individuality and reason. The third stage is the Christian stage, which is characterized by the realization of universal freedom and the recognition of the dignity of the individual.
Hegel’s philosophy of history has been the subject of much debate and criticism. Some have argued that his theory is too teleological, in that it assumes that history is moving inexorably towards a specific end goal. Others have criticized his theory for being Eurocentric and neglecting the contributions of non-Western cultures to human history. Nevertheless, Hegel’s philosophy of history remains an important and influential theory that continues to shape our understanding of human history.
Q10. a) Marx’s vision of a communist society
Karl Marx’s vision of a communist society was one in which the means of production were owned and controlled collectively by the community as a whole, rather than being owned privately by individuals or corporations. In this society, there would be no class distinctions, and all individuals would have equal access to resources and opportunities.
Marx believed that the capitalist system, in which a small group of wealthy capitalists owned the means of production and employed workers to generate profits, was inherently exploitative and oppressive. He argued that workers were alienated from their labor and had no control over the products they produced or the profits generated by their work.
In a communist society, Marx believed that workers would own and control the means of production, and would therefore have a say in how work was organized and how the products of their labor were distributed. The goal of communism, according to Marx, was to create a society in which the needs of all individuals were met, and in which people could live free, fulfilling lives without the constraints of economic inequality and exploitation.
However, it’s important to note that Marx’s vision of a communist society was never fully realized in practice. Communist regimes that arose in the 20th century tended to be authoritarian and oppressive, with little regard for individual freedom or human rights.
b) Marx’s theory of historical materialism
Marx’s theory of historical materialism is a central concept in his philosophy, economics, and political theory. It is the theoretical framework that Marx used to explain how societies develop and change over time. At its core, historical materialism is a materialist interpretation of history, which argues that the economic and social conditions of a society determine its development and change.
Marx argued that throughout history, societies have been organized around a particular economic system, such as feudalism or capitalism. The economic system of a society determines the relationships between people and the means of production. For example, under feudalism, the landowners controlled the means of production, and the peasants worked the land.
According to Marx, the class struggle is the driving force of historical development. Each economic system is characterized by a class struggle between the ruling class and the working class. The ruling class uses its power to maintain control over the means of production, while the working class seeks to gain control over the means of production and improve its living conditions.
Marx believed that as the contradictions between the ruling and working classes become more pronounced, the working class would eventually rise up in revolution and overthrow the ruling class. This would lead to the establishment of a new economic system, with a new ruling class and a new working class.
In the Marxist view of history, the ultimate goal is a classless society, where the means of production are owned and controlled by the people, rather than by a ruling class. Marx called this society communism, and he believed that it would eventually replace capitalism.
Overall, Marx’s theory of historical materialism is a complex and multifaceted theory that provides a framework for understanding how societies develop and change over time. It has been influential in the development of socialist and communist movements, and it continues to be studied and debated by scholars today.
GET Handwritten Hardcopy
All Over India Delivery
WhatsApp – 8130208920