IGNOU MPS 001 Free Solved Assignment 2022-23

IGNOU MPS 001 Free Solved Assignment 2022-23, IGNOU MPS 001 POLITICAL THEORY Free Solved Assignment 2022-23 If you are interested in pursuing a course in radio production and direction, IGNOU MPS 001 can be an excellent choice. In this article, we will take a closer look at what IGNOU MPS 001 is all about and what you can expect to learn from this course.

Important Links : Handwritten Hardcopy 

IGNOU MPS 001 Free Solved Assignment 2022-23 is a course offered by the Indira Gandhi National Open University (IGNOU) under the School of Journalism and New Media Studies. As the name suggests, it is a course on “Production and Direction for Radio.” The course is designed to provide students with a comprehensive understanding of radio production and direction and covers various topics related to this field. IGNOU MPS 001 Free Solved Assignment 2022-23

IGNOU MPS 001 Free Solved Assignment 2022-23


Q1. Examine political science as a science.

Political science is a social science that studies the theory and practice of politics and government. As a discipline, political science seeks to understand how power is distributed, how decisions are made, and how institutions operate within society.

Some scholars argue that political science is a science because it relies on empirical research and systematic analysis to develop theories and test hypotheses. Political scientists use various research methods, such as surveys, experiments, and case studies, to collect data and analyze political phenomena.

Others argue that political science is not a science in the same sense as natural sciences such as physics or chemistry because it deals with social phenomena that are complex, unpredictable, and difficult to quantify. They suggest that political science is better understood as a social science, which uses scientific methods to study human behavior and social interactions.

Despite this ongoing debate, political science has become increasingly scientific in recent decades, as researchers have adopted more rigorous research methods and developed sophisticated statistical techniques for analyzing data. Political scientists have also sought to develop more generalizable theories and models that can help us understand political phenomena across different contexts and time periods.

Overall, while there may be different views on the nature of political science, it remains an important and interdisciplinary field of study that seeks to advance our understanding of political phenomena and improve the quality of political decision-making.

Q2. Trace the genesis of democracy.

The concept of democracy, as we understand it today, has evolved over centuries, with its roots going back to ancient civilizations. The following is a brief timeline of the genesis of democracy:

  • Athens, Greece (5th century BCE): Athens is considered the birthplace of democracy. The Athenians developed a system of government in which every citizen had the right to vote and participate in the assembly, where laws were debated and passed.
  • Roman Republic (509-27 BCE): The Roman Republic was a system of government in which citizens elected representatives to govern them. It was the first known example of representative democracy.
  • Magna Carta (1215): The Magna Carta was a document that limited the power of the monarch and guaranteed certain rights to the people. It was a significant step toward the establishment of democracy in England.
  • Enlightenment (17th and 18th centuries): The Enlightenment was a period of intellectual and cultural growth that emphasized reason and individual rights. Many Enlightenment thinkers, such as John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau, developed ideas about democracy and individual liberty.
  • American Revolution (1775-1783): The American Revolution was a war fought by colonists against British rule. The colonists wanted more representation in their government and more say in how they were governed. The Declaration of Independence and the United States Constitution were both influenced by Enlightenment ideas about democracy and individual rights.
  • French Revolution (1789-1799): The French Revolution was a period of political and social upheaval in France that led to the overthrow of the monarchy and the establishment of a republic. It was inspired by Enlightenment ideas and was a significant step toward the establishment of democracy in France.
  • Industrial Revolution (18th and 19th centuries): The Industrial Revolution brought about significant social and economic changes that led to the rise of the middle class and the demand for more political representation.

Overall, the genesis of democracy can be traced back to ancient Greece and Rome, and its development was influenced by the Enlightenment, revolutions, and social and economic changes throughout history. Today, democracy has become a cornerstone of many modern societies, with many countries adopting democratic systems of government.

Q3. Examine the inter-relationship of duties and rights within liberal thought.

Within liberal thought, there is a strong emphasis on the inter-relationship of duties and rights. According to liberalism, individuals have both rights and duties, and these two concepts are closely connected.

On the one hand, rights are seen as the individual’s entitlements or claims against others. These can include rights to life, liberty, and property, as well as more specific rights such as freedom of speech, religion, and association. The idea is that individuals have these rights because they are human beings, and that they are entitled to them regardless of any social or political hierarchy. The liberal tradition sees these rights as natural, inalienable, and universal.

On the other hand, liberals also emphasize the importance of duties. These are the responsibilities that individuals have towards others and towards society as a whole. For example, individuals have a duty to respect the rights of others, to contribute to the common good, and to follow the law. In liberal thought, duties are seen as necessary to balance the exercise of rights and ensure that they do not conflict with each other.

The relationship between duties and rights is often described as reciprocal. This means that individuals have a duty to respect the rights of others, and in turn, they have a right to expect that their own rights will be respected. This reciprocity is seen as a key aspect of a just and fair society.

Liberalism also recognizes that there may be situations where rights and duties come into conflict. For example, the right to free speech may conflict with the duty to respect others’ feelings or to prevent hate speech. In these cases, liberals often advocate for a balance between the two, recognizing that neither rights nor duties should be absolute.

Overall, the inter-relationship of duties and rights is central to liberal thought. Liberals believe that individuals have both rights and responsibilities, and that these two concepts are closely intertwined. By emphasizing this relationship, liberals seek to create a society that is both free and just.

Q4. Discuss negative liberty.

Negative liberty is a concept in political philosophy that refers to the absence of external constraints or limitations on an individual’s actions. It is the freedom from interference by others or by the state, and is often contrasted with positive liberty, which refers to the freedom to achieve one’s goals or fulfill one’s potential.

Negative liberty is generally understood as a fundamental aspect of individual rights and freedoms in a liberal democratic society. It emphasizes the importance of protecting individuals from arbitrary interference by the state or other individuals, and allowing them to make their own choices about how to live their lives.

One of the most famous articulations of negative liberty is by the philosopher Isaiah Berlin, who distinguishes between “positive” and “negative” concepts of liberty. According to Berlin, negative liberty is “the area within which a man can act unobstructed by others.” It is the freedom from external constraints that enable individuals to pursue their own goals and live their lives as they see fit.

Critics of negative liberty argue that it can be used to justify inequalities of wealth and power, as it only concerns itself with the absence of constraints, rather than the positive promotion of freedom and equality. They argue that a focus solely on negative liberty can allow the powerful to exploit the weak, and can lead to a situation in which some individuals are free to dominate and control others.

Despite these criticisms, negative liberty remains an important concept in modern political philosophy, particularly in liberal democratic societies, where the protection of individual rights and freedoms is seen as a cornerstone of a just and fair society.

Q5. What is equality? Explain.

Equality is the principle of treating everyone fairly and impartially, without discrimination or bias based on differences in characteristics such as race, gender, religion, age, sexual orientation, or social status. It means that all people should have the same opportunities, rights, and privileges regardless of their individual differences.

Equality can also refer to a state or condition in which all individuals or groups have the same status, rights, and opportunities in society. This may involve addressing and remedying historical and systemic inequalities and working towards a more equitable distribution of resources and power.

In general, the concept of equality is grounded in the idea that all individuals should be valued equally and that differences should not be used to justify unequal treatment or outcomes. It is a fundamental human right and a cornerstone of many democratic societies.


6. (a) Classical Liberalism

Classical liberalism is a political ideology and philosophy that emphasizes individual liberty, free markets, limited government, and the rule of law. It emerged in the 18th century as a response to the authoritarianism of absolute monarchies and the economic mercantilism of the time.

Classical liberals believe that individuals should be free to pursue their own goals and interests, as long as they do not harm others or interfere with their freedom to do the same. They advocate for the protection of individual rights, including property rights, and argue that the government’s role should be limited to protecting those rights and ensuring the rule of law.

Classical liberalism also champions free markets and economic freedom, believing that competition and entrepreneurship are the best ways to create wealth and improve people’s lives. It opposes government intervention in the economy, including subsidies, tariffs, and price controls.

Overall, classical liberalism emphasizes the importance of individual freedom, limited government, and free markets as the foundations of a prosperous and just society.

(b) Liberal democratic welfare state

A liberal democratic welfare state is a type of government system that combines elements of liberalism, democracy, and welfare state policies.

Liberalism emphasizes individual rights, freedoms, and the rule of law, while democracy involves popular participation in the decision-making process through elections and other forms of civic engagement. A welfare state, on the other hand, is a government that provides social programs and services to ensure the well-being of its citizens, such as healthcare, education, and social security.

In a liberal democratic welfare state, the government provides a safety net for its citizens, while still respecting individual rights and freedoms. This type of government aims to balance the need for economic growth and individual achievement with the responsibility to ensure that no one falls through the cracks or is left behind.

Examples of liberal democratic welfare states include Canada, Sweden, and Norway, which all have strong social welfare programs, universal healthcare, and a high degree of political freedom and civil liberties.

7. (a) Libertarianism

Libertarianism is a political philosophy that emphasizes individual liberty and minimal government intervention in people’s lives. It asserts that individuals have the right to live their lives as they see fit, without interference from the government or other individuals.

Libertarians typically advocate for a free market economy, in which individuals are free to engage in voluntary transactions without government interference. They believe that free markets lead to greater prosperity and innovation, as individuals are incentivized to create value for others through the pursuit of their own self-interest.

In addition to advocating for economic freedom, libertarians also emphasize civil liberties and personal freedom. They believe that individuals should have the right to do as they please as long as they are not harming others, and that the government should not infringe on personal freedoms such as freedom of speech, freedom of religion, or the right to bear arms.

While there is no single definition of libertarianism, it is generally characterized by a commitment to individualism, free markets, and limited government intervention in people’s lives.

(b) Party as vanguard of the proletariat (V. I. Lenin)

V.I. Lenin, a Russian revolutionary and political leader, advocated for the concept of the “vanguard of the proletariat,” which referred to a revolutionary party that would lead the working-class in a revolution against capitalism.

According to Lenin, the working-class could not achieve revolution on its own, as it was too divided and lacked the necessary organization and leadership. Therefore, a vanguard party was needed to lead the proletariat in overthrowing the capitalist class and establishing a socialist society.

Lenin believed that the vanguard party should consist of professional revolutionaries who were dedicated to the cause of socialism and had the necessary knowledge and skills to guide the working-class. He also emphasized the importance of discipline within the party, arguing that the party must be tightly organized and strictly controlled in order to achieve its goals.

The concept of the vanguard party was central to Lenin’s vision of socialism and was a key element in the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia in 1917. However, it has also been criticized by some for its authoritarian tendencies and its potential to lead to a dictatorship of the party rather than a dictatorship of the proletariat.

8. (a) Gramsci’s notion of hegemony

Antonio Gramsci was an Italian Marxist philosopher and political theorist who developed the concept of hegemony. According to Gramsci, hegemony is the process by which a dominant group maintains its power and control over a society by winning the consent of the subordinate groups. It refers to the ways in which the ruling class is able to establish and maintain its dominance over other groups in society by influencing their beliefs, values, and attitudes.

Gramsci argued that hegemony was not simply a matter of brute force or coercion, but rather a more subtle process that involved the production and dissemination of ideas and values that were favorable to the ruling class. Through its control of cultural institutions such as the media, education, and religion, the ruling class was able to shape the beliefs and values of the subordinate groups, and thereby maintain its power and control.

Gramsci believed that the key to challenging the existing hegemony was to develop a counter-hegemony, which would challenge the dominant ideology and offer an alternative vision of society. This would involve building alliances between different groups in society and creating a new cultural and political leadership that could challenge the existing power structures.

Overall, Gramsci’s notion of hegemony highlights the importance of culture and ideology in the maintenance of power and control in society, and the need for social movements to challenge and transform these dominant ideologies.

(b) Critique of Marxism and Democratic Socialism

Marxism and democratic socialism are two political and economic ideologies that have been widely discussed and debated over the years. While they share some similarities in their critique of capitalism and their desire for a more equal society, they also have significant differences in their approach and implementation.

One of the main criticisms of Marxism is its focus on class struggle and its belief in the inevitability of a proletarian revolution. This has led to some authoritarian and violent interpretations of Marxism, such as in the Soviet Union and China, where individual rights and freedoms were suppressed in the name of the greater good of the proletariat. Critics argue that this approach ignores the importance of individual liberty and can lead to totalitarianism.

In addition, Marxism has been criticized for its view of human nature as being solely determined by economic factors. This reduces individuals to economic actors and ignores other aspects of human identity, such as culture, religion, and individual agency.

Democratic socialism, on the other hand, seeks to achieve socialist goals through democratic means. While this approach avoids some of the authoritarian pitfalls of Marxism, it has also been criticized for its feasibility and effectiveness. Critics argue that democratic socialism’s reliance on government intervention in the economy can stifle innovation and economic growth. In addition, they argue that it can lead to inefficiencies and bureaucracy, as seen in some European countries with extensive welfare states.

Furthermore, some critics argue that democratic socialism’s focus on wealth redistribution through taxation and government programs can disincentivize hard work and innovation, leading to a less dynamic and innovative economy.

In conclusion, while Marxism and democratic socialism share a desire for a more equal society, they differ in their approach and implementation. Both have been criticized for their feasibility and effectiveness, as well as their potential to stifle individual liberty and economic growth.

9. (a) Conservatism

Conservatism is a political and social philosophy that emphasizes preserving traditional values and institutions while opposing radical change. It is typically associated with the political right, although there are variations within conservative thought.

Conservatives generally believe in limited government, individual liberty, free markets, and a strong national defense. They often advocate for traditional values such as family, religion, and patriotism. They may be skeptical of government intervention in the economy and may support a free-market approach to social and economic issues.

Conservatives may also be skeptical of social change and may oppose progressive social movements such as feminism or the LGBTQ rights movement. They may emphasize the importance of individual responsibility and self-reliance rather than government welfare programs.

There are different types of conservatism, including traditional conservatism, neoconservatism, libertarian conservatism, and social conservatism. Each of these variations places a different emphasis on the role of government, individual liberty, and social values.

Overall, conservatism is a complex and multifaceted ideology that has evolved over time and is influenced by a variety of factors, including history, culture, and individual beliefs.

(b) Fundamentalism

Fundamentalism is a term that is commonly used to describe a strict adherence to the basic principles and tenets of a particular religious or ideological doctrine. It is characterized by an unwavering belief in the literal interpretation of sacred texts, a rejection of secular or modern values, and a strict adherence to traditional beliefs and practices.

In its most extreme forms, fundamentalism can lead to intolerance, exclusion, and even violence against those who do not adhere to its strict beliefs and practices. However, it is important to note that not all forms of religious or ideological conservatism are necessarily extremist or violent, and that many people who identify as fundamentalist simply prioritize their religious or ideological beliefs over other aspects of their lives.

10. (a) Nationalism

Nationalism is a political and social ideology that emphasizes the importance and sovereignty of a nation, which is defined as a group of people who share a common culture, history, language, and sometimes religion, and often inhabit a particular territory. Nationalists believe that the interests of the nation should be put above those of other countries or international organizations, and that the nation should have the right to self-determination, meaning the ability to govern itself and make decisions about its own future.

Nationalism can take many different forms, ranging from benign expressions of cultural pride and patriotism to more extreme and aggressive expressions that can lead to intolerance and conflict. Nationalism can also be associated with a variety of political and economic systems, from liberal democracy to authoritarianism.

While nationalism has played an important role in the formation and identity of many countries, it has also been a source of tension and conflict, particularly when competing national interests clash. It is important to distinguish between a healthy sense of national pride and a dangerous form of nationalism that promotes hatred and violence towards other nations or groups.

(b) Multiculturalism

Multiculturalism is a social and political concept that recognizes and celebrates the diversity of cultures within a society. It is based on the idea that different cultures can coexist and interact in a mutually respectful and beneficial manner. Multiculturalism is often seen as a response to the challenges posed by globalization, immigration, and the increasing diversity of modern societies.

The goal of multiculturalism is to create a society where people from different cultural backgrounds can live together peacefully and enjoy equal opportunities and rights. This means respecting and valuing cultural differences, promoting cross-cultural understanding and communication, and supporting cultural diversity through policies and programs.

Multiculturalism can have many benefits, including enriching a society with a variety of perspectives, traditions, and ways of life. It can also foster tolerance, mutual respect, and social harmony, as people learn to appreciate and understand different cultural values and practices.

However, multiculturalism can also pose challenges, particularly when it comes to integrating different cultural groups into a cohesive society. It requires a willingness to learn from and adapt to different cultural practices, as well as a commitment to finding common ground and promoting shared values.

Overall, multiculturalism is an important concept for creating inclusive and diverse societies that can thrive in a rapidly changing world.


GET Handwritten Hardcopy 
All Over India Delivery 
WhatsApp – 8130208920

Leave a Comment