IGNOU ECO 05 Free Solved Assignment 2022-23, IGNOU ECO 05 MERCANTILE LAW Free Solved Assignment 2022-23 If you are interested in pursuing a course in radio production and direction, IGNOU ECO 05 can be an excellent choice. In this article, we will take a closer look at what IGNOU ECO 05 is all about and what you can expect to learn from this course.
Important Links : Handwritten Hardcopy
IGNOU ECO 05 Free Solved Assignment 2022-23 is a course offered by the Indira Gandhi National Open University (IGNOU) under the School of Journalism and New Media Studies. As the name suggests, it is a course on “Production and Direction for Radio.” The course is designed to provide students with a comprehensive understanding of radio production and direction and covers various topics related to this field. IGNOU ECO 05 Free Solved Assignment 2022-23
- 1 IGNOU ECO 05 Free Solved Assignment 2022-23
- 1.1 Q1. Explain the law relating to commnicutation of offer and acceptance and their revocation.
- 1.2 Q2. a) “Silence as to the facts is not fraud” comment
- 1.3 b) What are contingent contracts? Stats the rules regarding enforcement of such contracts with examples.
- 1.4 Q3. a) “Delegatus non potest delegare”. Discuss the implication of this in relation to agency and state the exceptions to this rule.
- 1.5 b) Explain the rights and liabilities of partners on dissolution of partnership firm.
- 1.6 Q4. a) Explain the circumstances when a person other than the owner can make a valid pledge.
- 1.7 b) Discuss the legal rules for valid consideration with examples.
- 1.8 Q5. What is meant by delivery of goods? What are the rule relating to delivery of goods?
IGNOU ECO 05 Free Solved Assignment 2022-23
Q1. Explain the law relating to commnicutation of offer and acceptance and their revocation.
The law of contract recognizes the importance of communication in the formation of a contract. The basic principles of the law of offer and acceptance state that an offer made by one party must be communicated to the other party and accepted by that other party in order for a contract to be formed.
Offer: An offer is a proposal made by one party to another party, indicating that the offering party is willing to enter into a contract on certain terms. The offer must be communicated clearly and unambiguously to the offeree.
Acceptance: Acceptance is the agreement of the offeree to the terms of the offer. Acceptance must also be communicated to the offeror in order to form a contract. The acceptance must be clear and unambiguous and must match the terms of the offer.
Revocation: An offer can be revoked at any time before it is accepted, either by the offeror or by someone else authorized to revoke it on their behalf. Revocation must be communicated to the offeree before acceptance, and can be communicated by any reasonable means, including by telephone, email, or letter.
Counteroffer: A counteroffer is not an acceptance, but a rejection of the original offer and the simultaneous making of a new offer. It terminates the original offer and creates a new offer that the original offeror may accept or reject.
In summary, communication is a fundamental element in the formation of a contract, both in the making of an offer and in the acceptance of that offer. An offer can be revoked at any time before it is accepted, and a counteroffer is not an acceptance but a rejection of the original offer.
Q2. a) “Silence as to the facts is not fraud” comment
The statement “Silence as to the facts is not fraud” is not always true. While it is generally true that there is no legal duty to disclose all information in every circumstance, there are situations where silence or failure to disclose information can be considered fraudulent.
For example, if someone sells a product or service and intentionally withholds important information that would have affected the buyer’s decision to purchase, this could be considered fraudulent. In this case, the seller had a duty to disclose the information and their failure to do so could result in legal consequences.
Additionally, in some situations, silence can be seen as a form of misrepresentation. For instance, if a person makes a false statement, but then fails to correct the statement even though they later become aware of its falsehood, they can be held liable for fraud.
Overall, while there may not always be a legal duty to disclose all information, silence in certain circumstances can be seen as a form of fraudulent behavior.
b) What are contingent contracts? Stats the rules regarding enforcement of such contracts with examples.
A contingent contract is a type of contract where the performance of one or both parties depends upon the occurrence of an uncertain event. In other words, the contract will only be enforced if a certain condition is met.
There are two types of contingent contracts:
- Contracts based on the happening of an uncertain future event: In this type of contingent contract, the performance of one or both parties depends on the occurrence of an uncertain event in the future. For example, a contract where A agrees to sell his house to B if B’s business earns a profit of $500,000 in the next financial year. Here, the contract is contingent on the uncertain event of B’s business earning a profit of $500,000.
- Contracts based on the non-happening of a future uncertain event: In this type of contingent contract, the performance of one or both parties depends on the non-occurrence of an uncertain event in the future. For example, a contract where A agrees to pay B $1,000 if it doesn’t rain on a particular day. Here, the contract is contingent on the uncertain event of rain not happening on a particular day.
The rules regarding the enforcement of contingent contracts are as follows:
- The event must be uncertain: The event on which the contract is contingent must be uncertain. If the event is certain to happen, the contract is not enforceable.
- The event must be possible: The event on which the contract is contingent must be possible. If the event is impossible, the contract is not enforceable.
- The contract must be legal: The contract on which the contingency is based must be legal. If the contract is illegal, the contingency is also illegal, and the contract is not enforceable.
- The contingency must be the sole reason for non-performance: The non-performance of the contract must be solely due to the non-occurrence of the event on which the contingency is based.
- The contingency must be fulfilled within a reasonable time: The contingency must be fulfilled within a reasonable time. If the contingency is not fulfilled within a reasonable time, the contract may be terminated.
Examples of contingent contracts include:
- An insurance contract where the insurer agrees to pay a sum of money to the insured on the occurrence of an uncertain event, such as an accident or illness.
- A contract where a company agrees to pay a bonus to its employees if the company achieves a certain level of profitability.
- A contract where a builder agrees to complete a construction project within a certain time frame, and the buyer agrees to pay the builder a certain amount of money on completion. However, if the builder fails to complete the project within the agreed time frame, the buyer may be entitled to terminate the contract.
Q3. a) “Delegatus non potest delegare”. Discuss the implication of this in relation to agency and state the exceptions to this rule.
The Latin phrase “delegatus non potest delegare” means “a delegate cannot delegate.” This principle is a fundamental rule in agency law and applies to situations where an agent delegates their authority to another person to carry out a task on their behalf.
The implication of this principle is that an agent who has been given authority by a principal cannot delegate that authority to another person unless the principal has expressly authorized such delegation. If the agent does delegate their authority without proper authorization, then the agent will remain responsible for the actions of the person to whom they delegated their authority.
This principle is particularly important in situations where the agent is acting on behalf of the principal, such as in employment relationships or in situations where a contractor is acting on behalf of a client. In these situations, the agent must be careful not to delegate their authority without proper authorization as this may result in liability for both the agent and the principal.
However, there are some exceptions to the rule of “delegatus non potest delegare.” For example, an agent may delegate their authority if the delegation is necessary to perform the task assigned by the principal, or if the delegation is customary or usual in the particular industry or field. Additionally, an agent may delegate their authority if the principal has expressly authorized such delegation.
In summary, while the principle of “delegatus non potest delegare” is a fundamental rule in agency law, there are exceptions to the rule that allow for the delegation of authority in certain circumstances. Agents must be careful not to delegate their authority without proper authorization and should seek guidance from legal counsel if they are unsure about the scope of their authority.
b) Explain the rights and liabilities of partners on dissolution of partnership firm.
When a partnership firm is dissolved, the rights and liabilities of partners are determined by the partnership agreement, if there is one. If there is no agreement, then the partners are subject to the provisions of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932.
The following are the rights and liabilities of partners on dissolution of a partnership firm:
- Right to share in assets: On dissolution, the partners have a right to their respective shares in the assets of the firm. The assets of the firm are first used to pay off the liabilities, and then the remaining assets are distributed among the partners in proportion to their share in the firm.
- Liability for debts: Each partner is personally liable for the debts of the firm. This means that if the assets of the firm are not enough to pay off its debts, then the partners must pay the remaining amount from their personal funds.
- Right to sue: Partners have a right to sue for their share in the assets of the firm. They can also sue for damages if the dissolution of the firm was done in a manner that violated the terms of the partnership agreement or the law.
- Liability for wrongful acts: Partners are jointly and severally liable for any wrongful acts committed by any of the partners during the course of the partnership business.
- Right to use firm name: Unless otherwise agreed, partners cannot use the name of the dissolved firm for any business purposes.
- Right to compete: After dissolution, partners have the right to compete with the dissolved firm, unless otherwise agreed.
- Right to set-off: Partners have the right to set-off any amount due to them from the firm against any amount they owe to the firm.
It is important to note that the above mentioned rights and liabilities may vary depending on the terms of the partnership agreement and the specific circumstances of the dissolution. It is advisable for partners to consult with a legal expert to understand their specific rights and liabilities in case of dissolution.
Q4. a) Explain the circumstances when a person other than the owner can make a valid pledge.
A pledge is a legal arrangement in which a person, known as the pledger, pledges something of value, such as property or money, as collateral for a debt or obligation owed to another person, known as the pledgee. The pledgee has the right to hold onto the pledged asset until the debt or obligation is paid in full.
In general, only the owner of an asset can make a valid pledge. However, there are some circumstances when a person other than the owner can make a valid pledge:
- Authorized representative: If the owner of an asset authorizes another person to act as their representative, that person can make a valid pledge on behalf of the owner. For example, if a company authorizes one of its employees to act as its representative, that employee can pledge company assets as collateral for a loan.
- Legal guardian: If the owner of an asset is a minor or lacks the capacity to make legal decisions, a legal guardian can make a valid pledge on their behalf.
- Power of attorney: If the owner of an asset grants someone else a power of attorney, that person can make a valid pledge on behalf of the owner. A power of attorney is a legal document that grants someone else the authority to act on behalf of the owner in legal and financial matters.
- Co-owner: If an asset is owned jointly by two or more people, one co-owner can pledge the asset as collateral for a debt or obligation owed by all co-owners.
- Statutory authority: In some cases, the law may grant specific individuals or entities the authority to make a pledge. For example, a bank may have the statutory authority to pledge assets held in a customer’s account as collateral for a loan.
It is important to note that the circumstances under which a person other than the owner can make a valid pledge can vary depending on the specific laws and regulations of a particular jurisdiction. It is always best to consult with a qualified legal professional for guidance on any legal matters related to pledges.
b) Discuss the legal rules for valid consideration with examples.
Consideration is an essential element of a valid contract. It refers to the benefit received or promised by each party to the contract. The general rule is that for a contract to be enforceable, it must be supported by valid consideration. Here are the legal rules for valid consideration with examples:
- Consideration must be real: The consideration must have some value in the eyes of the law. It should not be illusory, fictitious, or impossible to perform. For example, if A promises to give B a million dollars if B can jump over the moon, this promise is not valid consideration because it is impossible to perform.
- Consideration must be sufficient: The consideration must be sufficient but need not be adequate. The court will not question the adequacy of the consideration as long as it has some value. For example, if A agrees to sell his car to B for $1, this may be valid consideration even though the car is worth much more than $1.
- Consideration must move from the promisee: Consideration must move from the promisee or someone else at the request of the promisee. For example, if A promises to pay B $100, and B’s sister, C, provides the consideration, this is not valid consideration because it did not move from the promisee.
- Consideration must be given in exchange for a promise: Consideration must be given in exchange for a promise. For example, if A promises to give B $100 as a gift, this is not valid consideration because it is not given in exchange for a promise.
- Consideration must not be past: Consideration must be present or future but not past. Past consideration refers to something that has already been done, and it cannot be considered valid consideration. For example, if A promises to pay B $50 for services B performed three years ago, this is not valid consideration because it is past consideration.
In conclusion, for a contract to be enforceable, it must be supported by valid consideration. The consideration must be real, sufficient, move from the promisee, given in exchange for a promise, and present or future. Understanding these legal rules can help ensure that your contracts are valid and legally enforceable.
Q5. What is meant by delivery of goods? What are the rule relating to delivery of goods?
Delivery of goods refers to the physical transfer of possession of goods from one party (usually the seller or the supplier) to another party (usually the buyer or the recipient). It is a crucial aspect of any transaction involving the sale or purchase of goods.
The rules relating to the delivery of goods may vary depending on various factors such as the terms of the contract, the mode of transportation, the nature of the goods, and the applicable laws and regulations. However, some of the general rules and principles that govern the delivery of goods are as follows:
- Delivery must be made at the agreed time and place: The seller and buyer must agree on the time and place of delivery of the goods. The seller must deliver the goods at the specified time and place, and the buyer must be present to receive the goods.
- Delivery must be made to the right person: The seller must ensure that the goods are delivered to the right person or entity as specified in the contract.
- Delivery must be made in the right quantity and quality: The goods must be delivered in the quantity and quality specified in the contract. If there is a discrepancy, the buyer has the right to reject the goods.
- Risk of loss or damage: The risk of loss or damage to the goods usually passes from the seller to the buyer upon delivery of the goods.
- Mode of transportation: If the goods are being transported by a carrier or a shipping company, the delivery of goods is governed by the terms of the contract of carriage.
- Documentation: The seller must provide the necessary documentation such as invoices, bills of lading, and certificates of origin to enable the buyer to take possession of the goods.
- Inspection: The buyer has the right to inspect the goods upon delivery to ensure that they are in the right condition and comply with the contract terms.
These are some of the general rules and principles that govern the delivery of goods. However, it is important to note that the specific rules and requirements may vary depending on the jurisdiction, the nature of the goods, and the terms of the contract.
GET Handwritten Hardcopy
All Over India Delivery
WhatsApp – 8130208920