IGNOU MSW 032 Social Work and Criminal Justice Free Solved Assignment 2022-23

IGNOU MSW 032 Free Solved Assignment 2022-23, IGNOU MSW 032 Social Work and Criminal Justice Free Solved Assignment 2022-23 If you are interested in pursuing a course in radio production and direction, IGNOU MSWE 032 can be an excellent choice. In this article, we will take a closer look at what IGNOU MSW 032 is all about and what you can expect to learn from this course.

Important Links : Handwritten Hardcopy 

IGNOU MSW 032 Free Solved Assignment 2022-23 is a course offered by the Indira Gandhi National Open University (IGNOU) under the School of Journalism and New Media Studies. As the name suggests, it is a course on “Production and Direction for Radio.” The course is designed to provide students with a comprehensive understanding of radio production and direction and covers various topics related to this field. IGNOU MSW 032 Free Solved Assignment 2022-23

IGNOU MSW 032 Free Solved Assignment 2022-23

Q1. What do you mean by ‘offence’? Classify offender for the purposes of different criminal
justice process.

In the context of criminal justice, an “offence” is a specific act or omission that is prohibited by law and for which an individual can be punished by the state. Offences can range from minor infractions, such as traffic violations, to serious crimes, such as murder or terrorism.

Offenders can be classified in different ways for the purposes of the criminal justice process, depending on the nature and severity of the offence, as well as the stage of the criminal justice process. Here are some common classifications:

  • Misdemeanor Offenders: These are individuals who have been charged with minor criminal offences, such as traffic violations or low-level drug offences. Misdemeanors are usually punishable by fines, community service, or short-term imprisonment.
  • Felony Offenders: These are individuals who have been charged with serious criminal offences, such as murder, rape, or armed robbery. Felonies are usually punishable by longer-term imprisonment, often in a state or federal prison.
  • Juvenile Offenders: These are individuals who are under the age of 18 and who have been charged with a criminal offence. Juvenile offenders are usually subject to a different set of laws and procedures than adult offenders, and their cases are often handled in juvenile court.
  • Repeat Offenders: These are individuals who have been charged with multiple criminal offences over time. Repeat offenders may face more severe penalties, such as longer-term imprisonment or mandatory rehabilitation programs.
  • White-collar Offenders: These are individuals who have committed nonviolent crimes for financial gain, such as embezzlement or insider trading. White-collar offenders may be subject to fines, restitution, or imprisonment.
  • Cyber Offenders: These are individuals who have committed crimes using computers or the internet, such as hacking, identity theft, or cyberbullying. Cyber offenders may be subject to fines, imprisonment, or other penalties.

It’s important to note that these classifications are not exhaustive and that there can be overlap between them. Additionally, the criminal justice process can involve multiple stages, including investigation, arrest, charging, trial, and sentencing, and the classification of offenders may vary depending on the stage of the process.

Q2. Explain the sociological theories of criminal behaviour.

There are several sociological theories that attempt to explain criminal behavior. Here are some of the main ones:

  • Strain theory: This theory suggests that individuals are more likely to engage in criminal behavior when they experience strain or stress due to a mismatch between their goals and their means to achieve them. When individuals feel blocked from achieving their goals through legitimate means, they may resort to criminal activity.
  • Social learning theory: This theory argues that criminal behavior is learned through interactions with others, particularly those in an individual’s social environment. Individuals may adopt criminal behavior if they see others engaging in it and if they are rewarded for such behavior.
  • Control theory: This theory posits that criminal behavior occurs when an individual’s social bonds with society are weak or broken. When individuals lack attachments to others or are not integrated into society, they may be more likely to engage in criminal activity.
  • Labeling theory: This theory argues that criminal behavior is not inherent in individuals, but rather is a result of the labels attached to them by society. Individuals who are labeled as criminals may come to internalize this identity and continue engaging in criminal behavior as a result.
  • Conflict theory: This theory suggests that criminal behavior is the result of social and economic inequalities and power struggles between different groups in society. Those who are marginalized or disadvantaged may engage in criminal behavior as a way to resist or challenge dominant groups.

Overall, sociological theories of criminal behavior emphasize the role of social factors and interactions in shaping criminal behavior, rather than individual characteristics or innate tendencies.

Q3. Trace the evolution of the Criminal Justice System.

The Criminal Justice System has undergone significant changes throughout history, and its evolution can be traced back to ancient times. Here are some of the major milestones in the development of the Criminal Justice System:

  • Ancient Times: In early civilizations, including Mesopotamia, ancient Egypt, and ancient Greece, justice was primarily administered by the community, with little or no centralized authority. Punishments were often severe and brutal, such as the Code of Hammurabi in ancient Babylon, which prescribed an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.
  • Middle Ages: During the Middle Ages, criminal justice began to become more centralized and formalized, with the establishment of courts and the use of juries. The concept of trial by jury dates back to the Magna Carta of 1215, which granted certain rights to English citizens and limited the power of the monarch.
  • Enlightenment Era: During the Enlightenment era, in the 18th century, the principles of equality, liberty, and the rule of law began to take hold. This led to the development of modern legal systems and the idea that individuals had rights that must be protected. This period also saw the rise of penitentiaries as a means of punishment and rehabilitation.
  • Industrial Revolution: In the 19th century, the Industrial Revolution brought about significant changes in society, including an increase in crime. This led to the development of the police force and a more centralized criminal justice system. Prisons also became more prevalent during this time, with the goal of rehabilitating offenders rather than simply punishing them.
  • 20th Century: In the 20th century, the criminal justice system underwent significant reforms, including the introduction of probation and parole, the development of forensic science, and the establishment of specialized courts to deal with specific types of cases, such as drug courts and domestic violence courts. The Civil Rights Movement also had a significant impact on the criminal justice system, leading to changes in policing practices and the development of community-oriented policing.
  • 21st Century: In the 21st century, the criminal justice system continues to evolve, with a greater emphasis on rehabilitation and restorative justice. There is also a growing recognition of the need to address issues such as mass incarceration and racial disparities in the justice system.

Overall, the evolution of the Criminal Justice System has been marked by a shift towards more centralized and formalized systems, as well as a greater emphasis on rehabilitation and protecting individual rights.

Q4. Enlist the various types of Courts in India

In India, the court system is divided into several types of courts, which are as follows:

  • Supreme Court of India
  • High Courts of respective States
  • District Courts and Sessions Courts
  • Civil Courts
  • Criminal Courts
  • Family Courts
  • Labour Courts and Industrial Tribunals
  • Consumer Courts or Consumer Disputes Redressal Forums
  • Revenue Courts
  • Juvenile Justice Boards
  • Tribunals (such as Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Central Administrative Tribunal, National Company Law Tribunal, etc.)

Each court has its own jurisdiction, power, and function, depending on the type of cases it deals with.

Q5. Discuss the process of the police to investigate cognizable and non-cognizable offences.

In India, the criminal justice system defines two types of offenses: cognizable and non-cognizable offenses. The police follow different procedures to investigate these two types of offenses.

Cognizable offenses are serious crimes that require immediate police action. These crimes include murder, rape, robbery, and kidnapping, among others. In these cases, the police can register a First Information Report (FIR) and begin investigating the crime without any warrant or permission. The police can arrest the accused without a warrant and can search the place where the crime has taken place without permission. The police can also seize any relevant evidence without a warrant.

The process of investigating cognizable offenses begins with the registration of an FIR. The FIR is a written document that contains the details of the crime, the name of the accused, and other relevant information. The police then collect evidence, interview witnesses, and conduct raids to gather more information about the crime. They also interrogate the accused and record their statements. If the police find sufficient evidence, they may charge the accused and file a charge sheet in court.

Non-cognizable offenses are minor crimes that do not require immediate police action. These crimes include minor accidents, minor theft, and minor assault, among others. In these cases, the police cannot register an FIR without the permission of a magistrate. The police can only investigate these crimes after the magistrate has given permission.

The process of investigating non-cognizable offenses begins with the filing of a complaint by the victim. The police then record the complaint in a General Diary (GD) and begin their investigation. They collect evidence, interview witnesses, and conduct raids to gather more information about the crime. However, they cannot arrest the accused without a warrant or permission from the magistrate.

In both cases, the police need to follow the rules and regulations laid down by the criminal justice system. They need to ensure that the rights of the accused and the victim are protected, and that justice is served.

Q6. Trace the origin and development of the Probation System

The probation system, as a form of criminal justice intervention, originated in the United States in the mid-19th century. Prior to this, offenders were either incarcerated or punished through corporal punishment. However, with the increasing concerns about the harshness of these punishments and their failure to address the root causes of criminal behavior, reformers began to explore alternatives.

The first formal probation system was established in Massachusetts in 1878 by a Boston shoemaker named John Augustus. Augustus, who was concerned about the fate of offenders he saw in court, offered to act as their surety and supervise them in the community instead of sending them to jail. He believed that offenders would be better served by addressing the underlying causes of their behavior and helping them reintegrate into society. Augustus’s efforts were so successful that other jurisdictions began to adopt his approach.

In the years that followed, probation systems were established across the United States, and the concept was later adopted by other countries, including the United Kingdom and Canada. Over time, the probation system evolved to become a more formalized and structured intervention, with trained probation officers responsible for supervising and supporting offenders in the community.

In the 20th century, the probation system continued to evolve and expand, with new approaches to rehabilitation and reintegration being developed. For example, during the 1960s and 1970s, there was a growing emphasis on “community corrections,” which emphasized the use of community-based programs and services to support offenders and reduce recidivism.

Today, the probation system remains an important part of the criminal justice system in many countries, providing an alternative to incarceration for non-violent offenders and supporting their reintegration into society. However, the effectiveness of the probation system has been the subject of ongoing debate, with some critics arguing that it can be overly punitive and fails to address the underlying causes of criminal behavior.

Q7. Enlist the main legislations that govern the administration of prisoners in India.

The administration of prisoners in India is primarily governed by the following legislations:

  • The Prisons Act, 1894: This Act is the primary legislation that regulates the management and administration of prisons in India. It provides for the establishment of prisons, their classification, inspection, and management.
  • The Prisoners Act, 1900: This Act provides for the regulation of the treatment of prisoners in India, including their custody, maintenance, and welfare.
  • The Transfer of Prisoners Act, 1950: This Act provides for the transfer of prisoners from one prison to another within India or to a foreign country.
  • The Model Prison Manual, 2016: This manual provides guidelines for the management and administration of prisons in India. It covers aspects such as the classification of prisoners, their health, education, work, and rehabilitation.
  • The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015: This Act provides for the care, protection, and rehabilitation of children in conflict with the law. It prohibits the imprisonment of children below the age of 18 years and provides for their rehabilitation through various measures.
  • The Probation of Offenders Act, 1958: This Act provides for the release of certain offenders on probation instead of sending them to prison. It aims to promote the rehabilitation of offenders and their reintegration into society.
  • The Indian Penal Code, 1860: This Act defines various offenses and prescribes punishments for them. It also provides for the classification of offenses into various categories, including those that are punishable by imprisonment.

These legislations aim to ensure that the administration of prisoners in India is carried out in a humane and just manner, with a focus on their rehabilitation and reintegration into society.

Q8. Discuss in brief the legislative mandate on visitorial system in India.

In India, the legislative mandate on visitorial system is established by the University Grants Commission (UGC), which is a statutory body responsible for coordinating, determining, and maintaining the standards of higher education in the country. The visitorial system is a mechanism of oversight and control over the functioning of universities in India, and it is exercised by the President of India, who is the Visitor of all Central Universities in the country.

Under the UGC Act, 1956, the President of India is authorized to exercise visitorial powers over universities, including the power to inquire into the affairs of the university and issue directives for the proper functioning of the institution. The visitorial system is intended to ensure that universities maintain high standards of academic excellence, ethical conduct, and good governance.

The visitorial powers of the President are delegated to a Visitor’s Nominee, who is appointed by the President to carry out inspections and inquiries into the affairs of universities. The Visitor’s Nominee has the power to examine any record, document, or information related to the university and to make recommendations to the university authorities or the UGC.

The visitorial system in India is an important mechanism for ensuring accountability and transparency in the higher education sector. It provides a mechanism for resolving disputes and grievances, addressing issues related to academic standards, and promoting good governance in universities. However, it has also been criticized for its lack of effectiveness and for being subject to political interference.

GET Handwritten Hardcopy 
All Over India Delivery 
WhatsApp – 8130208920

Leave a Comment