CBSE Class 12th The Interview Most Important Questions with Solutions

CBSE Class 12th The Interview Most Important Questions with Solutions – The author, Christopher Silvester, dives into the world of interviews, highlighting their ever-present nature in the world of media since their invention in the 19th century. He emphasizes the diverse perspectives surrounding interviews, revealing that while some view them as valuable tools for understanding personalities and uncovering truths, others find them intrusive and even dehumanizing.

Subject	English Language & Literature
Class	12
Board	CBSE
Chapter Name	The Interview

• History: Interviews have been used in journalism for over 130 years.
• Purpose: Diverse purposes – gathering information, entertainment, understanding personalities.
• Varying Opinions: Some view it as a valuable tool for truth and understanding, while others see it as an intrusion or misrepresentation.
• Negative Views: Many celebrities dislike interviews.
• Reasons: They feel their privacy is invaded, their personalities misconstrued, or their work misrepresented.
• Examples: Rudyard Kipling, V.S. Naipaul, Lewis Carroll.

CBSE Class 12th The Interview Most Important Questions with Solutions – Silvester showcases various celebrities’ conflicting views on interviews. Some, like film director Federico Fellini, find them exhausting and stressful, while others, like novelist Michael Ondaatje, appreciate their potential for creative exchange.

This contrasting array of opinions instantly ignites the reader’s curiosity about the nature and purpose of interviews. The introduction delves into the powerful impact interviews have on shaping public perceptions. An interview can become a defining moment for an individual, potentially eclipsing their true identity and leaving a lasting impression on the audience. This raises essential questions about the ethics of representation and the role of the interviewer in shaping narratives.

Q:- What was unique and distinctive about Eco’s academic writing style?

Umberto Eco, the renowned Italian semiotician, novelist, and philosopher, possessed a unique and captivating voice that transcended the boundaries of traditional academic writing. Here are some key aspects that distinguished his style:

1. Playfulness and Personalization: Unlike the often dry and impersonal tone of scholarly works, Eco infused his writing with wit, humor, and personal anecdotes. He wasn’t afraid to express his own opinions and engage in intellectual playfulness, making his work both informative and enjoyable.

2. Narrative Approach: Instead of presenting his research in a dry, linear fashion, Eco often adopted a narrative approach. He wove his arguments into engaging stories, drawing on historical and literary references to illustrate his points. This made his writing feel more like a captivating journey than a textbook slog.

3. Intertextuality: Eco was a master of intertextuality, weaving references and allusions to other works of literature, philosophy, and history into his writing. This created a rich tapestry of meaning, rewarding attentive readers with new insights and connections.

4. Wide-Ranging References: Eco’s vast knowledge and intellectual curiosity allowed him to draw on a diverse range of sources in his writing. He could seamlessly switch from medieval philosophy to pop culture references, keeping his readers engaged and surprised.

5. Conversational Tone: Despite the depth of his subject matter, Eco’s writing often felt like a conversation with a knowledgeable and witty friend. He avoided overly technical jargon and used clear, concise language, making his work accessible to a wider audience.

Examples of Eco’s Unique Style:

• In his book “Open Work,” Eco discusses the concept of interpretation through the lens of a detective story, blurring the lines between academic analysis and literary fiction.
• In “The Name of the Rose,” his bestselling novel, Eco blends medieval philosophy, semiotics, and a murder mystery, creating a complex and intellectually stimulating read.
• Even in his more scholarly works, like “The Limits of Interpretation,” Eco peppers his arguments with humor and personal reflections, keeping the reader engaged.

Overall, Umberto Eco’s unique blend of playfulness, narrative, intertextuality, and wide-ranging references created an academic writing style that was both intellectually stimulating and engagingly readable. He challenged the stuffy conventions of scholarly discourse and proved that complex ideas could be presented in a way that was both informative and enjoyable.

Q:- What impression do you form about Umberto Eco as a scholar and writer on the basis of ‘The Interview’?

CBSE Class 12th The Interview Most Important Questions with Solutions – Based on “The Interview,” Umberto Eco emerges as a multifaceted figure, seamlessly blending the roles of scholar and writer. Here are some key impressions:

1. An Enthusiastic and Inquisitive Mind:

• Eco’s passion for knowledge shines through. He delves into diverse topics with genuine curiosity, from medieval history to semiotics and contemporary media.
• This intellectual zest keeps the interview dynamic and engaging, leaving the reader with a sense of wanting to explore alongside him.

2. A Master of Intertextuality:

• Eco effortlessly weaves references to literature, philosophy, and pop culture into the conversation. This intertextuality creates a rich tapestry of meaning, rewarding attentive readers with deeper insights and connections.
• It showcases his vast knowledge and ability to draw unexpected parallels, demonstrating his intellectual depth and playful creativity.

3. A Humorous and Self-Aware Observer:

• Eco doesn’t shy away from injecting humor into the interview. He pokes fun at himself and academic jargon, creating a more relatable and down-to-earth persona.
• This self-awareness makes him a more engaging conversationalist and prevents the interview from becoming bogged down in academic seriousness.

4. A Bridge Between Academia and the Public:

• Eco’s ability to translate complex theoretical concepts into accessible language is evident. He avoids esoteric jargon and explains his ideas with clarity and wit.
• This makes him a valuable bridge between the academic world and the general public, fostering a wider appreciation for intellectual inquiry.

5. A Scholar who Values Storytelling:

• Throughout the interview, Eco emphasizes the importance of storytelling in conveying knowledge. He draws on historical narratives and fictional examples to illustrate his points.
• This highlights his understanding of the power of narrative to engage and educate, showcasing his blend of scholarly rigor and creative expression.

Overall, “The Interview” reveals Umberto Eco as a brilliant scholar with a playful and inquisitive mind. His intertextual mastery, insightful humor, and ability to make complex ideas accessible paint him as a compelling figure who seamlessly blends academic depth with the art of storytelling.

Q:- What are some of the positive views on interviews?

Interviews, whether as the interviewer or interviewee, can be a fantastic learning experience. By asking and answering questions, you gain new insights, perspectives, and knowledge. As an interviewer, you actively engage with different viewpoints and expertise, expanding your own understanding of the world. As an interviewee, you have the opportunity to reflect on your skills, experiences, and goals, potentially leading to self-discovery and growth.

Networking and Relationship Building

Interviews can act as gateways to valuable connections and networks. By interacting with different people, you build relationships that can open doors to future opportunities.

Q:- Why do most celebrity writers despise being interviewed?

Invasion of Privacy: Interviews often delve into personal aspects of an author’s life, which can feel intrusive and uncomfortable. Even questions about the writing process can expose details they’d prefer to keep private.

Repetitive Questions: Authors may feel frustrated by facing the same predictable questions again and again, especially if they’ve already addressed them publicly. This can drain the spontaneity and enjoyment out of the interview process.

Misrepresentation and Sensationalism: Interviews can be edited or misconstrued, leading to distorted depictions of the author and their work. This can be particularly frustrating if the focus is on sensational headlines rather than the substance of their writing.

Pressure to Perform: Interviews can be nerve-wracking, with authors feeling pressure to be witty, insightful, and articulate on the spot. This can undermine their genuine responses and lead to feeling drained or exhausted afterwards.

Focus on Celebrity Status: Some authors dislike the emphasis on their fame rather than their work. They might feel their artistic contributions are overshadowed by superficial questions about their lifestyle or personal relationships.

Lack of Control: The interview format isn’t always conducive to in-depth discussions about literature. Time constraints and the interviewer’s agenda can limit the scope of exploration, leaving authors feeling unsatisfied with the conversation.

Exploitation and Commodification: Authors might feel used by media outlets, who see them as a means to attract viewers and generate clicks. This can be especially disheartening if interviews feel more like promotional tools than genuine dialogues.

Alternative Avenues for Connection: With the rise of social media and personal websites, some authors prefer to connect with their readers directly, bypassing the limitations and potential pitfalls of interviews.

It’s important to remember that every author is an individual with their own preferences and boundaries. While some may find interviews rewarding, others prefer alternative ways to engage with their audience. By respecting their diverse perspectives and choices, we can appreciate their contribution to literature without forcing them into an uncomfortable spotlight.

Q:- Why do some celebrity writers not like being interviewed?

Q:- Why do you think Christopher Silvester describes the viewpoints of other writers and authors when discussing the concept of an interview? Support your opinion with reference to any one writer cited.

Q:- Umberto Eco, with reference to “The Name of the Rose” says, “I think if I had written The Name of the Rose ten years earlier or ten years later, it wouldn’t have been the same.” What could he have meant?

Q:- What is the belief in some primitive cultures about being photographed?

Q:- How can we say that Umberto Eco had a wide range of writing?

Q:- What are some of the positive views on inter-views?

Q:- What do you understand by the expression “thumbprints on his windpipe”?

Q:- Who, in today’s world, is our chief source of information about personalities?

Q:- Do you think Umberto Eco likes being interviewed? Give reasons for your opinion.

Q:- How does Eco find the time to write so much?

Q:- What was distinctive about Eco’s academic writing style?

Q:- Did Umberto Eco consider himself a novelist first or an academic scholar?

Q:- What is the reason for the huge success of the novel, The Name of the Rose?