IGNOU MPY 002 Western Philosophy Free Solved Assignment 2022-23

IGNOU MPY 002 Free Solved Assignment 2022-23, IGNOU MPY 002 Western Philosophy Free Solved Assignment 2022-23 If you are interested in pursuing a course in radio production and direction, IGNOU MPY 002 can be an excellent choice. In this article, we will take a closer look at what IGNOU MPY 002 is all about and what you can expect to learn from this course.

Important Links : Handwritten Hardcopy 

IGNOU MPY 002 Free Solved Assignment 2022-23 is a course offered by the Indira Gandhi National Open University (IGNOU) under the School of Journalism and New Media Studies. As the name suggests, it is a course on “Production and Direction for Radio.” The course is designed to provide students with a comprehensive understanding of radio production and direction and covers various topics related to this field. IGNOU MPY 002 Free Solved Assignment 2022-23

IGNOU MPY 002 Free Solved Assignment 2022-23


Q1. What is Cartesian dualism? Discuss Anti-Cartesian foundation of Pragmatism.

Cartesian dualism is a philosophical concept introduced by René Descartes in the 17th century, which posits that the mind and body are two distinct entities that interact with each other. According to Descartes, the mind is a non-physical substance that thinks, reasons, and perceives, while the body is a physical entity that moves, interacts with the world, and is subject to the laws of physics.

This dualistic view has been heavily criticized by philosophers and scientists over the years, particularly in the 20th century. One of the most significant criticisms comes from the pragmatic school of thought, which rejects the Cartesian separation of mind and body, arguing that they are not distinct entities but rather two aspects of the same whole.

Pragmatism is a philosophical approach that emphasizes the practical consequences of ideas and theories. It holds that knowledge is not fixed and eternal but rather evolves and adapts over time as we learn more about the world through experience. Pragmatists reject the idea that there is a fixed, objective reality that we can discover through pure reason and instead focus on how we can use our knowledge to solve practical problems and improve our lives.

Pragmatists argue that Cartesian dualism is flawed because it separates the mind from the body, which creates an unbridgeable gap between our thoughts and actions. According to pragmatists, our thoughts and actions are deeply interconnected, and it is impossible to understand one without the other. They argue that our ideas and beliefs arise from our experiences and interactions with the world, and that these experiences shape how we think and act.

In contrast to Cartesian dualism, pragmatism emphasizes the importance of experience and experimentation in developing knowledge. Pragmatists believe that knowledge is not a fixed, abstract entity but rather a dynamic process that evolves over time as we learn more about the world. They reject the idea that there is a fixed, eternal truth that we can discover through pure reason, arguing instead that our understanding of truth is constantly evolving and adapting to new information and experiences.

Overall, the anti-Cartesian foundation of pragmatism represents a rejection of the idea that there is a fundamental separation between mind and body, and a recognition of the deep interconnection between our thoughts and actions. By emphasizing the practical consequences of ideas and theories, pragmatism offers a more flexible and adaptable approach to knowledge that is better suited to the complex and ever-changing world we live in.

Q2. Write a note on the notion of causality. How does David Hume challenge the notion of causality?

The notion of causality refers to the relationship between cause and effect, where a cause is understood to produce an effect or outcome. This concept is fundamental to our understanding of the natural world and is central to many scientific and philosophical debates.

David Hume, an 18th-century Scottish philosopher, challenged the notion of causality by arguing that there is no logical or empirical basis for our belief in cause and effect relationships. Hume believed that our understanding of causality is based on nothing more than our past experiences of regularities in the natural world. For example, we might observe that when we strike a match, it produces fire, and we assume that the striking of the match caused the fire. However, Hume argued that we have no logical justification for this assumption, as we have not observed any necessary connection between the striking of the match and the production of fire.

Hume went on to argue that even if we could establish a causal connection between two events, we could never be certain that the same causal relationship would hold true in the future. Hume believed that our belief in causality is ultimately based on habit and custom rather than on any rational or scientific foundation.

Hume’s challenge to the notion of causality has had a profound impact on philosophy and science, and his ideas continue to be debated and discussed to this day. While many philosophers and scientists have sought to defend the idea of causality, Hume’s skepticism has inspired a critical examination of our assumptions about the natural world and our ability to understand it.

Q3. Answer any two questions in about 250 words each.

a) Do you agree that there is some common underline theme present in Early and later
Wittgenstein? Give arguments to support your answer.

b) Write a note on the Socrates’s dialectic method.

c) Write an essay on the Don Scotus’s conception of God.

d) Write a note on the sense-reference problem in the light of Frege’s philosophy.

Q4. Answer any four questions in about 150 words each.

a) Write a note on Kalam cosmological argument.

b) Evaluate the notion of private language.

c) Write a short note on picture theory.

d) Write a note on the concept of time and space in Kant’s philosophy

e) Distinguish Modernism with Post-modernism.

f) Write a short note on Logical Positivism.

5. Write short notes on any five in about 100 words each.

a) Phenomena

b) Analytic a priori judgement

c) The idea of ‘Potentiality’ in Aristotle’s philosophy

d) Black Feminism

e) Esse est percipi

f) Coherence theory of truth

g) Realism

h) Basic assumptions of Empiricism

GET Handwritten Hardcopy 
All Over India Delivery 
WhatsApp – 8130208920

Leave a Comment